If you’ve been following social media the last few weeks, you may have seen the idea thrown about regarding a Mark Zuckerberg-Elon Musk cage match.<\/p>\n
The proposed fight between the Meta (Facebook) and X (Twitter) bosses has been scrubbed for the nonce (Zuckerberg alleges Musk isn’t serious<\/a> about it); however, U.Missouri-Kansas City’s Kristen Barber says the whole idea really<\/em> was about how \u201c’performances of virility’ tend to coincide with beliefs that masculinity is either in crisis or under attack.”<\/p>\n The professor of race, gender and ethnic studies says in The Conversation<\/em><\/a> that Zuckerberg and Musk “join the ranks of other high-profile men in public and political positions who have shown off their physical strength to burnish their status.”<\/p>\n “To me, the chest puffing between Musk and Zuckerberg is a desperate display of masculinity for two tech nerds with deep pockets,” Barber (pictured) <\/em>says. “They say money can\u2019t buy happiness. Perhaps money can\u2019t buy masculinity, either.”<\/p>\n Barber also blasts right-leaning commentators such as Jordan Peterson and Ben Shapiro for claiming “men are being asked to castrate themselves in the name of equality” and ripping the movie “Barbie,” respectively.<\/p>\n Belief in “masculinity crises” come about during “times of progressive social change,” Barber says, and folks like Peterson and Shapiro end up blaming progressives who “critiqu[e] traditionally masculine mores and values.”<\/p>\n MORE:<\/strong> Texas A&M scholar takes on \u2018toxic masculinity\u2019 of \u2018car culture\u2019<\/a><\/p>\n From the article<\/a>:<\/p>\n Gender scholars point to the turn of the 20th century and the 1990s as other moments of social change that sparked similar anxieties.<\/p>\n In 1890, moves toward coeducation stoked debates around girls and boys being taught the same curriculum. Advocates suggested that sex shouldn\u2019t matter in the classroom and that girls\u2019 education should prepare them for jobs outside the home.<\/p>\n This didn\u2019t go over well with men who benefited from gender segregation. The Boy Scouts of America actually emerged in 1910 so that boys were assured a space where girls and women weren\u2019t allowed \u2013 and where boys would be \u201csufficiently\u201d acquainted with masculinity.<\/p>\n Similarly, the emergence of identity politics in the 1990s, which highlighted rights-based ideologies, scrutinized, in particular, the privileges of white men.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n At such times, Barber says men “have historically taken predictable actions to reclaim the idea that they are inherently different from women \u2013 and thus belong in different spaces.”<\/p>\n According to her faculty page, Barber’s research deals with “the mechanisms that perpetuate gender inequalities with a focus on norm violation […] what can we learn when people cross culturally established boundaries around gender, race, class, and sexuality?”<\/p>\n The sociologist also is author of the book “Styling Masculinity: Gender, Class and Inequality in the Men\u2019s Grooming Industry” and once served as editor of the journal Men and Masculinities<\/em>.<\/p>\n MORE:<\/strong> Study: Men refusing to wear masks = \u2018toxic masculinity\u2019 and racism<\/a><\/p>\n IMAGE: U. Missouri-Kansas City<\/p>\n