{"id":137304,"date":"2023-11-14T15:51:13","date_gmt":"2023-11-14T20:51:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.thecollegefix.com\/?p=137304"},"modified":"2023-11-14T15:52:55","modified_gmt":"2023-11-14T20:52:55","slug":"middle-schoolers-blackface-suspension-upheld-despite-legal-warning-from-free-speech-group","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thecollegefix.com\/middle-schoolers-blackface-suspension-upheld-despite-legal-warning-from-free-speech-group\/","title":{"rendered":"Middle schooler’s ‘blackface’ suspension upheld despite legal warning from free speech group"},"content":{"rendered":"

The San Diego Unified School District middle schooler who was suspended<\/a> for wearing “blackface” (pictured) <\/em>has had his suspension upheld — despite a legal warning from the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression.<\/p>\n

The description of student J.A.’s “offense” reads \u201cpainted his face black at a football game\u201d and was noted under the category \u201chate incidents\u201d with \u201coffensive comment, intent to harm.\u201d<\/p>\n

J.A. said the paint was just school spirit for the football game. His parents told school officials he never even heard of “blackface” until someone told him about it.<\/p>\n

These didn’t matter. Muirlands Middle School Principal Jeff Luna (pictured) <\/em>reportedly declared J.A.’s paint “blackface” because the opposing football team was \u201clargely black.\u201d<\/p>\n

In a letter<\/a> dated November 8, FIRE called on Luna to clear J.A.’s disciplinary record “as the First Amendment protects [his] non-disruptive expression of team spirit via a style commonly used by athletes and fans \u2014 notwithstanding your inaccurate description of it as ‘blackface.’\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"FIRE included numerous photos of professional athletes with face paint just like J.A.’s, noting “Such use of eye black began as a way to reduce glare during games, but long ago evolved into ‘miniature billboards for personal messages and war-paint slatherings.’\u201d<\/p>\n

“There is no evidence J.A.\u2019s face paint caused a disruption\u2014let alone a material and substantial one\u2014at the football game or at school afterward,” FIRE continued. “The complete lack of disruption is unsurprising, as the sight of fans in face paint is familiar to and expected by anyone who has ever attended a football game or other sporting event.”<\/p>\n

As the “final” decision to uphold J.A.’s suspension was made on the same date as the FIRE letter, the free speech organization sent a follow-up<\/a> asking SDUSD Superintendent Lamont Jackson if the decision “will not be reconsidered.”<\/p>\n

The district letter upholding J.A.’s suspension (pictured) <\/em>says “schools have a responsibility to maintain and encourage proper standards of behavior for all students,” and calls suspension a “necessary tool” as well as a “valuable educational device.”<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

\n

Eye black \u2260 blackface<\/p>\n

Punishing a student for his innocent expression isn\u2019t just ridiculous. <\/p>\n

It\u2019s unconstitutional. <\/p>\n

FIRE is huddling in case @sdschools<\/a> refuses to back down and clear his disciplinary record\u2014and they won't like our next play. pic.twitter.com\/5pFHhwh9iU<\/a><\/p>\n

— FIRE (@TheFIREorg) November 14, 2023<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n